Who does The World think should pay for keeping murderers alive for the potential research value of some of them?
Do you say that this cost should be socialized and borne by the unwilling? Today, this seems to be the only option.
Or, should just those who think it's worthwhile to maintain the health and confinement of murderers bear the full cost of doing so?
If it's the latter, do you expect researchers (and their voluntary benefactors) to be willing to pay for this themselves?
And again, today we don't really have a mechanism for transferring these costs to those who want to bear them. So is The World advocating, in the current political system, stealing from the unwilling to finance the research interests of others?
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Who Should Pay?
Who does The World think should pay for keeping murderers alive for the potential research value of some of them?
Do you say that this cost should be socialized and borne by the unwilling? Today, this seems to be the only option.
Or, should just those who think it's worthwhile to maintain the health and confinement of murderers bear the full cost of doing so?
If it's the latter, do you expect researchers (and their voluntary benefactors) to be willing to pay for this themselves?
And again, today we don't really have a mechanism for transferring these costs to those who want to bear them. So is The World advocating, in the current political system, stealing from the unwilling to finance the research interests of others?