I recognize a difference between government activities that are necessary and sufficient to protect our liberty in ways that require force vs. engaging in all other imaginable activities that purport to provide public goods.
I can see an argument for requiring people to support (financially) the former activity to some extent (although I'd like to move away from this involuntary support as soon as possible) but I can't see any such moral argument for the latter.
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Public Goods
I could, but I wouldn't.
I recognize a difference between government activities that are necessary and sufficient to protect our liberty in ways that require force vs. engaging in all other imaginable activities that purport to provide public goods.
I can see an argument for requiring people to support (financially) the former activity to some extent (although I'd like to move away from this involuntary support as soon as possible) but I can't see any such moral argument for the latter.