the first objection goes something like: how do you help someone voluntarily if he's intentionally wicked? the idea is he will reject all offers that would help. but people *aren't* intentionally wicked, and there is some way to reach him.
it's not about talking or walking, it's about what he *thinks*. that talking and walking are different simply is no obstacle.
it's not a brain issue. if you doubt me, ask a brain doctor to take a look.
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
all feasible
the first objection goes something like: how do you help someone voluntarily if he's intentionally wicked? the idea is he will reject all offers that would help. but people *aren't* intentionally wicked, and there is some way to reach him.
it's not about talking or walking, it's about what he *thinks*. that talking and walking are different simply is no obstacle.
it's not a brain issue. if you doubt me, ask a brain doctor to take a look.
-- Elliot Temple
http://www.curi.us/