Add new comment

Please explain

What is the the difference between a conspiracy theory and a valid theory? e.g.: "The US went to Iraq for the oil." vs. "The US went to Iraq so as to use it as a base to attack terrorist sponsoring states."

Both theories explain motives in terms other than what the official government position is. Or are both of these conspiracy theories? Or neither?

by a reader on Fri, 09/03/2004 - 02:21

Reply



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.




  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <blockquote> <a> <b> <strong> <i> <em> <u> <ol> <ul> <li> <img> <strike> <cite> <sup> <sub>
  • Leave a blank line between paragraphs.
  • '@' characters will be replaced with images to impede spammers.
More information about formatting options