Here's some info that will hopefully open your eyes, especially to the posters from 12/28 and 5/31.

Regarding Jimmy Walter taking Jimmy Walter seriously:
The reason he doesn't hire his own engineers to do the research is for PUBLICITY. He honestly doesn't care whether or not he gives away the prize. What he wants to do is get lots of engineers (and others) thinking about the issue.

Regarding a Non-Problem:
Fire didn't cause the towers to collapse. Look carefully at some of the pictures of the holes caused by the "commercial" airliners. You'll see people in the holes. How hellishly hot could those impacts have been, if people survived to go and stand in the impact sites? What's more, is that the remainder of the towers were officially un-damaged. Why, then, did they crumble like dust, if the rest of the building hadn't been bombarded by airliners as well? In case you still don't have your thinking caps on, I'll answer the above questions. The crash sites weren't very hot at all, and not capable of melting steel. The remainder of the towers crumbled because they were demolished by explosives from the inside.

Regarding Estelle's post:
What's more important - the fact that an anti-Semite (assuming he is) wants to have meetings, or the likely chance that portions of the US government caused 9/11 to happen?

Please think critically readers, and don't blindly swallow what the mass media feeds you.