There is far too much evidence to avoid the conclusion that other foul play, aside from the airplanes crashing into towers 1 and 2, occurred on 09/11/01. The largest single piece of evidence is the collapse of wtc7. You can find photographs of the building, with two or three small well contained office fires, no broken windows, yet the building collapsed to dust. The leaseholder said, in an interview on public television, that they decided to "pull" the building.
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Too much evidence
There is far too much evidence to avoid the conclusion that other foul play, aside from the airplanes crashing into towers 1 and 2, occurred on 09/11/01. The largest single piece of evidence is the collapse of wtc7. You can find photographs of the building, with two or three small well contained office fires, no broken windows, yet the building collapsed to dust. The leaseholder said, in an interview on public television, that they decided to "pull" the building.
So, why are there, have there been, no subpoenas?