The "rational prospect, ultimately fulfilled, that affected populations would exert pressure for the cessation of hostilities" [...] has always motivated Israel's attacks on civilian populations, Israeli diplomat Abba Eban explained years ago.
“What moral creed [...] allows the killing of children as a regrettable effect of the enemy's locating himself amongst innocents?” The answer is, of course, all of them, depending on circumstances – with one exception: pacifism. And pacifism is immoral because it is an abdication of the responsibility to defend oneself and others. (The circumstances include, for example, some of those where all options have the killing of children as regrettable consequences.) Moreover, the worse the evil being faced, the more immoral pacifism is.
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Matchless moral scrupulousness
That is a lie propagated by Chomsky.
“What moral creed [...] allows the killing of children as a regrettable effect of the enemy's locating himself amongst innocents?” The answer is, of course, all of them, depending on circumstances – with one exception: pacifism. And pacifism is immoral because it is an abdication of the responsibility to defend oneself and others. (The circumstances include, for example, some of those where all options have the killing of children as regrettable consequences.) Moreover, the worse the evil being faced, the more immoral pacifism is.