I think that those are not just other words, but a false assertion of the implications of the original words.
The World responded to an assertion that the commonly accepted theory that Nazis started the Reichstag fire was similar to the conspiracy theories that they criticize, by explaining why the theories are different.
The reader ignores the argument and implies that The World claims some sort of unique authority over interpretation of facts. This is in direct conflict with the evidence and is not only misleading, but rude.
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Other Words
I think that those are not just other words, but a false assertion of the implications of the original words.
The World responded to an assertion that the commonly accepted theory that Nazis started the Reichstag fire was similar to the conspiracy theories that they criticize, by explaining why the theories are different.
The reader ignores the argument and implies that The World claims some sort of unique authority over interpretation of facts. This is in direct conflict with the evidence and is not only misleading, but rude.
Gil