Add new comment

Re: False Dichotomy

'Attempted bribery'. Yes, and also, under that scheme the contributors would not get their portion of defence taxes back. So they would not be buying defence, only a 'say' in a policy that they already agree with! Plus they would be indemnifying some of the anti-war people whom the government is forcing to contribute. But why, under Libertarian ethics, should they be under any obligation to indemnify the victims of someone else's crime?

by Editor on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 00:39

Reply



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.




  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <blockquote> <a> <b> <strong> <i> <em> <u> <ol> <ul> <li> <img> <strike> <cite> <sup> <sub>
  • Leave a blank line between paragraphs.
  • '@' characters will be replaced with images to impede spammers.
More information about formatting options