Add new comment

Re: Anything else?

Just to be clear: you still haven't defended the *methods* used by the WWF "scientists", only their conclusions.

If you'd like to concede they are no good, even as a thought experiment, we could discuss what that means for the report. If not, I'll wait.

-- Elliot Temple
curi@curi.us
Dialogs

by Elliot Temple on Tue, 10/31/2006 - 21:29

Reply



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.




  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <blockquote> <a> <b> <strong> <i> <em> <u> <ol> <ul> <li> <img> <strike> <cite> <sup> <sub>
  • Leave a blank line between paragraphs.
  • '@' characters will be replaced with images to impede spammers.
More information about formatting options