When it comes down to it, to be truly altruistic an action cannot benefit me. It means doing things I have no incentive to do
But isn't it worse than that? If you think that an action is morally right, then (unless you are for some reason psychologically conflicted or irrational about it) you will choose to do it. In which case it does benefit you in the sense that counts: according to your own values. Hence an action taken wholeheartedly and in the belief that it is morally right, can never be altruistic. And I suppose that is the reason that altruism is basically immoral. (Though I would not go so far as to say it always is.)
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Re: Altruism
Elliot wrote:
But isn't it worse than that? If you think that an action is morally right, then (unless you are for some reason psychologically conflicted or irrational about it) you will choose to do it. In which case it does benefit you in the sense that counts: according to your own values. Hence an action taken wholeheartedly and in the belief that it is morally right, can never be altruistic. And I suppose that is the reason that altruism is basically immoral. (Though I would not go so far as to say it always is.)