I agree that Objectivism is not fully coherent. I still don't really understand how Objectivists justify induction from their Law of Identity! Like you, I find much merit in Rand's writings, but I wonder how the flaws of Objectivism would expose themselves in an Objectivist society.
Even though many Objectivists seem to misunderstand Popper (for example, this), they are not shy in criticising him. Now I accept that some of the criticism of Popper is valid - he was fallible after all and his social engineering is highly questionable - but by denying Critical Rationalism, Objectivists deny our best theory of knowledge creation and this can only be bad for libertarianism.
You are welcome to post comments with or without logging in.
Logging in does not get you any more content but it does give you lists of content
you haven't seen yet.
We will not give out your email address.
If you want others to be able to contact you privately, include your email address in your signature.
Re: Objectivism
Elliot,
I agree that Objectivism is not fully coherent. I still don't really understand how Objectivists justify induction from their Law of Identity! Like you, I find much merit in Rand's writings, but I wonder how the flaws of Objectivism would expose themselves in an Objectivist society.
Even though many Objectivists seem to misunderstand Popper (for example, this), they are not shy in criticising him. Now I accept that some of the criticism of Popper is valid - he was fallible after all and his social engineering is highly questionable - but by denying Critical Rationalism, Objectivists deny our best theory of knowledge creation and this can only be bad for libertarianism.